The Covid Deception Aimed At Disarming YOU
Every day on the UK’s phone-in stations you can hear “ordinary” people arguing for more protection, more restrictions, more lockdowns. Even if one life is saved, they say, it is worth the pain. Lives, they assert, come before money. These people may be well-meaning, but they fail to recognise the social and economic costs of government intervention in a free society and a free market. Neither do they recognise how their opinions are being directed by the false and selective information they receive from the media. They are victims of smoke and mirrors, a deception: the Covid deception aimed at disarming you.
This article is in two parts. First, an evaluation of the information and misinformation surrounding the virus, and second, a look at the evidence for a completely different agenda that is driving Covid-19 policy.
Governments cannot protect the population from a virus. Restrictions and lockdowns cannot and will not contain it, neither will they save a single life. The idea that medical decisions about implementing or not implementing lockdowns is a financial consideration is utterly false. The damage to the economy has quite clearly not influenced the Government’s decisions. Unfortunately the health of the economy and that of the population are intrinsically linked: a fact studiously ignored by “the scientists”. Lockdowns wreck the economy and that takes lives.
Government have acted maliciously in censoring doctors, nurses and NHS staff. The people have the perfect right to hear what is going on in hospitals, and the medical profession have a duty to look after the public and to reassure them.
World Doctors Alliance
Trapped as they are by their trust in the political class, the callers to these radio stations are inadvertently appealing for unemployment, hardship, sickness and death. Furthermore, they give no consideration to the immeasurable damage that is being done to individual freedoms and rights. The fact is that the majority of the population are being deceived.
Covid-19 has proved less deadly than previous influenza seasons – There were 50,100 flu deaths from December 2017 to March 2018 in England and Wales. There were 80,000 flu deaths in 1969. To date we have circa 43,000 Covid-19 related deaths in the UK.
World Doctors Alliance
Recent studies have shown that, whilst the virus is responsible for the loss of many elderly and vulnerable people, it is the actions of governments around the world, purportedly aimed at saving lives, that have resulted in a vastly greater number of deaths. That is not just the assessment of an increasing number of independent researchers, but is also not denied by many governments, including those of the US and the UK. Meanwhile thousands of doctors and scientists have petitioned the US Health Dept. to end lockdowns and a similar appeal in the UK has been made to Boris Johnson. [20/10/2020] Now six more brave doctors of the World Doctors Alliance have written a comprehensive condemnation of the Government’s deception, which has attracted thousands of signatures. They explain why there is no need for a vaccine and why 80% of “cases” are perfectly healthy people.
As far back as May, researchers were warning that the US was storing up 65,000 deaths per month as a result, for example, of missed health appointments, missed diagnoses, suicides resulting from job losses and the fact that more than one half of America’s children will not receive their childhood vaccinations. The situation in the UK is harder to determine, but there is plenty of evidence of elevated, non-Covid death rates here too. Yet the lockdowns continue.
Covid-19 was put on death certificates merely on the ‘suspicion’ of people having Covid-19. This may well be unlawful, since it is a crime to falsify death certificates.
World Doctors Alliance
Keeping the Public Sick & Ignorant
Most people accept without question whatever the BBC or Sky are telling them that the government is currently advising. That advice has, according to the government, so far cost 43,000 lives. The “rules” are so confusing, unclear and irrational that not even the Prime Minister can accurately recite them. They are not a life-saving response to the disease and have failed utterly. This is clear when the truth about the disease, which is readily available for those who spend a little time to research it, is set out.
Here’s what we know about the characteristics of people most susceptible to Covid-19:
- Over 64 years of age
- Overweight or obese
- Suffering from other conditions (for example, hypertension, obesity, chronic lung conditions like TB, COPD, asthma, cystic fibrosis, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, cancer, kidney disease, liver disease, smokers)
- Compromised immune system
- Deficient in Vitamins D&C, Zinc prior to contracting Covid-19
Covid-19 poses a very small risk for healthy under 60 year olds who have a greater chance of accidental drowning than dying from Covid-19.
World Doctors Alliance
Here’s what we know about how to obtain the best outcomes for people who contract Covid-19
- Treat immediately upon contagion – dozens of studies around the world demonstrate that early intervention reduces both the duration and seriousness of symptoms and saves lives.
- Administer Vitamins C&D and Zinc intravenously.
- Administer one or more of the proven treatments (including Hydroxychloroquine (HDC) despite being rejected by the WHO. Many studies of HDC have had results suppressed for example NCT04321278; NCT04261517; ChiCTR2000029868. Yet hundreds of doctors claim it as a cure.)
Here’s what the NHS says about treatments:
“There is currently no specific treatment for coronavirus (COVID-19), but you can often ease the symptoms at home until you recover.”
Notice there is no recommendation to take vitamin supplements or zinc; no offer of Remdesivir (despite the acquisition on Oct 8th of 500,000 doses of Remdesvir for the EU and UK) or Hydroxychloroquine. There is no attempt to minimise the disease and save lives. There is just the lie that there is no “specific” treatment. In fact there are many.
The government and media tell another lie by suggesting that a vaccine will be a specific treatment. However, Dr Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the lead physician on the White House Coronavirus Task Force, says he expects the vaccine to be, at best, 75% effective. This figure is similar to the effectiveness of many current treatments.
Here’s a list of treatments apparently or proven to be beneficial (those bolded are primarily effective if administered early):
318H (Monoclonal antibody); Actemra (tocilizumab) (Monoclonal antibody); Activase; AN01 (rhsACE2); Aviptadil (RLF-100); Azithromycin; Baricitinib; Bemcentinib; BOLD-100; Camostat mesylate (Foypan); Chloroquine; Combinational therapy (Triazavirin); COVID-19 antibody therapy; EIDD-2801; Favipiravir (T-705); Fingolimod; Galidesivir (BCX4430); Ganovo (Danoprevir); Hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil); Ivermectin; Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir); Kevzara (sarilumab) (Monoclonal antibody); LAM-002A (Apilimod); Leronlimab (PRO 140); Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC); Nafamostat mesylate (Fusan); Prezista/ Prezcobix (darunavir + cobicistat) (Combinational therapy); Remdesivir (GS – 5734); Remestemcel-L; Ruxolitinib (Jakafi, Jakavi); TAK-888 (Plasma-derived antibodies); Thalidomide; TMC-310911 (ASC-09); Truvada (emtricitabine + tenofovir); Umifenovir (Arbidol); Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide VIP.
Here’s what the NHS recommend you do if you believe you have the disease.
“Leave your home and travel to get a test (put others at risk). Self-isolate for at least ten days or until you feel better.”
Dozens of papers have been written by doctors around the world on the critical importance of early treatment, yet the NHS tells us to go home and wait. Presidents Trump (76) and Bolsanaro (65) recovered from the disease within four days after they were immediately given the treatments that the WHO and the NHS claim either do not exist or are “unspecific”. Instead of offering these treatments to the public, the government has opted for a series of unproven restrictions on our freedom that will eventually kill far more people than if they had done nothing at all.
We have safe and very effective treatments and preventative treatments for Covid-19, we therefore call for an immediate end to all lockdown measures, social distancing, mask wearing, testing of healthy individuals, track and trace, immunity passports, the vaccination program and so on.
World Doctors Alliance
The World Health Organisation sets the agenda which most national health departments are following. It is clear that their objective is to tread water until a vaccine arrives, regardless of how many lives are lost in the meantime.
Following “The Science”
The asinine mantra of government that it is following “the science”, has been picked up by a clueless population who have been duped into naively believing that such a phenomenon actually exists. If science tells us anything at all, it is that “the science” is baseless, has nothing to do with science and has been proven wrong time and again. In reality “the science” has far more to do with politics than it ever had with real science.
Boris Johnson has been asked repeatedly to justify the “rule of six” and the 10pm “curfew” by publishing the scientific rationale. He has failed to do so. Local restrictions continue to be imposed in a seemingly random way, irrespective of the supposed infection numbers in each area. The various official forecasts of cases and deaths have repeatedly failed to materialise in practice. The fatality figures, by the health department’s own admission, do not measure people who died because of the virus, and so there is no ability to assess the actual danger posed by it. There is no scientific justification or proven benefit resulting from social distancing, wearing masks or even washing hands. Countries in Africa where hygiene standards and population density were, we were told, certain to result in catastrophic consequences from the disease, have in reality fared far better than almost all countries where restrictions were most universally imposed. Sweden, where no lockdowns were imposed and masks are rarely worn, has seen death rates progressively decline and their case fatality rate of 6.1% substantially betters the UK’s at 8% (based upon the false official figures).
Counting death certificates with a ‘mention’ of Covid-19 as being a death caused by Covid-19 is a gross misrepresentation of the facts and has vastly over exaggerated the death toll.
World Doctors Alliance
At the outset we were told that the restrictions were imposed to “flatten the curve” so as to prevent the NHS being overwhelmed. In fact, except in a couple of localities, the NHS never came close to capacity. Now, it appears, as the government puts the Nightingale hospitals on standby, it is prepared to see a much larger number of hospitalisations. Why? How is it different now compared to March?
The claimed reason for the restrictions has changed too. Instead of “flattening the curve” we are now to “control the disease”: an aim that many scientists have said is pointless and counter-productive, even if it were possible.
Vaccine to the Rescue?
A simultaneous, but diametrically opposed official narrative is that the disease will be defeated when herd immunity is achieved. This was defined as the point when 85% plus had suffered the disease or been vaccinated. Initially we were told that this can only be achieved with a vaccine. Bill Gates appeared on the BBC stating clearly his objective to vaccinate the entire population of the world as the only means by which the virus will be defeated. Yet three times in the past 100 years, serious pandemics have ended spontaneously within a couple of years without any medical or social intervention whatsoever.
Recognising the public’s resistance to a vaccine, officials have, in recent weeks, begun to play down its importance. Media outlets repeatedly remind us that there may never be a vaccine. Even if one comes along, Kate Bingham, the head of the UK’s vaccine taskforce, tells us that, “There is going to be no vaccination of people under 18. It’s an adult-only vaccine for people over 50 focusing on health workers and care home workers and the vulnerable.”
This low-key approach will of course change when a vaccine does eventually appear. Why else would tests of a proposed health passport (evidence of vaccination required before travel) be starting now at Heathrow.
[The majority of the UK population are woefully ignorant of the damage vaccines can do, since the media are complicit in ignoring the many studies demonstrating it (read this if you wish to inform yourself). The value of vaccines, which have undoubtedly saved countless lives, should be determined in an independent cost/benefit risk assessment. Instead, companies undertake their own safety tests, whilst taxpayers pick up the pieces in the unlikely event that victims are able to overcome the obstacles put in their way of proving the cause. Governments know the risks and recompense the most severely damaged victims under the cover of non-disclosure agreements.]
We have very highly likely reached herd immunity and therefore have no need for a vaccine.
World Doctors Alliance
Now, as the WHO and Gates seek to prepare us for annual Covid vaccinations, documents show how the “no profit” pledges of the vaccine companies have actually limited their pledge to just the first few months. Covid-19 is certain to make drug companies billions of pounds, funded by billions of taxpayer’s cash, primarily from the UK and the US. Meanwhile, the thousands of naïve individuals who signed up to the dangerous task of testing the vaccines, believing they were doing a public service, will receive a maximum of £625 to cover their expenses.
Another Agenda – An Imposed “New Normal”
The questions must be asked: how much evidence does the general public need before they realise the government’s measures do not save lives? What will it take to convince people that lockdowns and restrictions wreck economies, destroy jobs, ruin lives and cause death? Apparently, the chorus of dissent from, across the globe, of thousands of scientists, doctors, economists and social welfare workers is not enough. More to the point, when will it dawn on the general populous that if saving lives is not the objective, then there must be another one?
Whether this virus escaped a lab by accident, or was deliberately released, an objective overview of all the reactions, medical and political, should lead any intelligent individual to recognise that saving lives is not the objective of the lockdowns and, in fact the opposite has been achieved. On the other hand, freedom and rights have been severely curtailed. A new incantation has spread throughout the world. It commands us to accept without question, “The New Normal”, a message that amounts to: you will never be free again, GET USED TO IT!
The media ensure that the bureaucrats get this message across:
Subtle dialogue that pervades advertising seeks to engage us emotionally in the human “family” fighting together (on their terms of course) to “defeat” the disease, as if it were an army of occupation, by willingly accepting the “necessary” restrictions on our freedom.
If they have had you clapping like a trained monkey in their psychological game, perhaps it’s time to stand back and review the evidence.
You need look no further than the United Nation’s Agendas 21 and 2030, and The World Economic Forum’s Great Reset. There you will find an ideology that is set to pervade the world. It is an ideology of domination and management: a system of government controlled by technocrats, not the people. There you’ll get a peek into your, and your children’s, future. Covid-19 is the justification that runs through everything; claiming connections to climate change, social control and the introduction of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
The latter describes the technologies that result from the amalgamation of digital, biological and physical sciences: transhumanism, robotics, artificial intelligence, etc. The “etc.” being both limitless and transformational for our daily lives and described in tens of thousands of articles on the World Economic Forum (WEF) website. In isolation they appear innocent, even visionary. Drawn together, they describe a dystopia that makes the novel Brave New World almost appealing.
The final objective is the concentration of power and resources in a handful of companies and bureaucrats. This process is already evident in the existence of the richest companies in the history of the planet: Apple, which supplies half of the mobile phones in the world; Google, which controls much of our access to information; Amazon, currently vying for first place among retailers with Walmart. Banking also has it leviathans, as soon will every sector. Through public-private partnerships major companies, like Serco and G4S, already exert enormous influence in public policy and that is only set to grow. In the 1940s they called such collaboration, Fascism.
The people pushing this agenda were never elected by the people and most will not even recognise many of their faces, yet they control our futures.
Covid-19 has accelerated the agenda. As smaller businesses fail, their markets are consumed by the bigger players: Amazon has grown by over $50bn in 2020. As millions lose their jobs across the world, their effort will be replaced with technology and their incomes by government hand-outs. Many will never work again. As central banks print money to stimulate and indebt the world’s ruined economies, the threat of hyper-inflation and currency failures looms. Once the old financial paradigm has been destroyed, the WEF will get their way. In an even more globalised world national currencies will be replaced with the much vaunted Central Bank Digital Currency, a universal payment system with the power to control the movement of money. Ultimately the vision is for global government; a goal justified, they say, by a disparate, chaotic global response to the pandemic and climate change, proving that only centralised control can bring about order. They extend this argument to effective management of international crime, food security and many other issues.
“Conspiracy theorists” will seek to convince you that all this is the vision of a cabal of nefarious rich people who are following an evil plan to take over the world. In reality it is just a shared, liberal (communist) ideology driven by confidence in the superiority of technology, the profit motive, and an obsessive belief in collectivism. The wealthy proponents of the system claim the right to impose it on the rest of the human race. Anyone who challenges their agenda is held in particular contempt. (Remember Hilary Clinton’s “basket of irredeemable deplorables”, Obama’s “desperate clingers”, John McCane’s “crazies” and Rockefeller’s “useless eaters” .)
As time passes we will see a super-race of technologically-enhanced humans, far superior physically and mentally to our present condition. Whilst for the average person this may sound as far-fetched as a science fiction movie, these technologies are already in seminal development and moving much faster than many suppose. Remember that 20 years ago, Facebook didn’t exist, Google was a glint in Larry page’s eye, electric cars came out of Star Trek and a large television was a big square box in the corner with a blurry 32 inch screen.
One example of the new technologies is Elon Musk’s Neurolink, but the secret work being undertaken by organisations like DARPA and CERN are thought to be even more advanced. For futurists this may all sound very exciting, but the penalty for such “progress” is the loss of what many of us hold dear: freedom, self-determination, freedom of expression, individuality, possessions, nationhood, culture, diversity, humanity.
If all this seems a very long way from Covid-19 and lockdowns, remember it is not this article that makes these connections, but countless articles on the WEF website and the vision for the future set out in the UN’s Agenda 2030 to which most of the world’s nations are fully signed up.
It is clear from many documents produced by, for or referenced by the WEF, that a major concern for them is the management of the population to accept the changes that will be needed for their agenda to come to fruition. A major part of that is management and manipulation of the news and information that the public receive. An equally, if not more important task, is the conditioning of the population to accept the changes by experience. This is where Covid-19 has been very useful in generating so much fear that people actually ask to be restricted and locked down.
A recent survey by Freedom House, documents how this is being done in dozens of countries around the world. Respondents pointed to a wide range of issues that have been directly affected by governments’ Covid-19 response such as,
- Limits to free movement
- Judicial system abuse
- Privacy violations
- Electoral freedom and fairness
- Restrictions on the press
- Abuse by police
- Restrictions on freedom of speech
- and so on
A Brave New World of totalitarian control is just around the corner. For those with eyes to see and ears to hear, the evidence is all around us. Other articles on this site explain that the basic elements: a single currency, a global government and the homogenisation of religion were all foretold in the Bible, three thousand years before any of them were even possible, let alone foreseeable. They, along with other events taking place now, (such as the signing of Arab/Israeli peace agreements, the effects of climate change and increase in seismic disturbances), are signs of the end of the current era of humanity. Sadly though, most people reject that, and the route to salvation, without ever studying the book they have been taught to hold in contempt.
If you value freedom and life, now is the time to investigate their true meaning and recognise that you and your children are under threat. Covid-19 is just the beginning: the planned end of the human race as we know it, is now in view.
If you found this article interesting, please share it and comment below. If you are in Lincolnshire and seek like-minded people please consider joining taG.